Stalled Progress
It takes longer than you think
Rebuilding from scratch is a massive undertaking. You’re not just replacing code—you’re replacing functionality, business logic, integrations, workflows, content structures, permissions models, data schemas, and performance requirements that have evolved over years.
What sounds like a 12-month project often becomes a 2- to 3-year journey. And during that time, the business is effectively on hold—waiting for a future platform that hasn’t launched yet, while competitors continue to improve.
By the time the new system is ready, the business has likely changed, customer expectations have evolved, and internal teams may have already built workarounds on the legacy platform.
Budget Overruns
Budgets blow up
Large rebuilds almost always exceed budget. Why?
- Rebuilding existing features takes longer than planned.
- Requirements change mid-project, causing extra work.
- Dependencies are uncovered late, needing custom fixes.
- Teams spend months recreating features users already rely on, just to catch up.
And once you're halfway in, it becomes difficult to pull out. The organization is locked in—invested emotionally, financially, and politically. Even if priorities change, people keep the project going because they’ve already invested so much, which adds risk and makes it harder to stay flexible.
The Big Bang Cutover Problem
Go-live is a gamble
A total switchover is stressful. Even if you test everything, something always breaks.
It’s the digital equivalent of changing the engine mid-flight.
In practice, this switch introduces significant operational risk:
- Data can get lost or corrupted
- Users get confused or unhappy with sudden changes
- Connections to other services might break
- Teams struggle to fix issues under pressure
Even if you’ve tested the system thoroughly, the live environment always behaves differently. And with the entire business riding on the transition, there’s little room for failure.